Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

This forum is for comments and the exchange of information relating to Trojan Boats and boating. Please do not post used parts or boats For Sale in this area. For general, non-boating topics please use our "General Discussions" section.

Note: Negative or inflammatory postings will not be tolerated.

Moderators: BeaconMarineBob, Moderator, BeaconMarineDon

Post Reply
lottanerv
Registered user
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:18 am

Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by lottanerv »

My 1980 F32 has twin Chrysler through 360 V-8. They are tired and need replacement. Tired of spending over $1000 to replace exhaust systems on these engines. Fewer and fewer sources seem to be available for increasingly pricey parts.
So what do you guys think? Should I go with Chevys or re-built Chryslers.
Boaitng is escape
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

If you chose to go with a Chrysler re-man you would still have the same issue with exhaust systems as you present engines . Not sure why you think the chevy would be better although could be cheaper and available in more places .

Fresh water cooling the manifolds will add years of life but you may need a larger heat exchanger .
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
kallen
Sporadic User
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:48 pm
Location: Ivy lee, ontario,canada

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by kallen »

Went thru the same dilema several years ago. Went with rebuilding the chryslers.Rebuild what you have. Cheapest way to go. The 360 are 250 hp.I changed the cam to a higher profile. What a difference. What parts are difficult to get ?. Chryslers are a 2 bolt main where as a chevy needs a 4 bolt main. If you have already changed the exhaust manifolds bonus. With a chevy engine you will be changing the exhaust manifolds, carbs and transmission bell housing x 2.
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

kallen wrote:Went thru the same dilema several years ago. Went with rebuilding the chryslers.Rebuild what you have. Cheapest way to go. The 360 are 250 hp.I changed the cam to a higher profile. What a difference. What parts are difficult to get ?. Chryslers are a 2 bolt main where as a chevy needs a 4 bolt main. If you have already changed the exhaust manifolds bonus. With a chevy engine you will be changing the exhaust manifolds, carbs and transmission bell housing x 2.
While I will agree with you on some points , I will disagree on others , 4 bolt main is not needed Manifold life would depend on the brand . Carbs life I see no difference and you could put a Edelbrock on a chevy . Bell housing ? How often do you see them fail ?
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
kallen
Sporadic User
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:48 pm
Location: Ivy lee, ontario,canada

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by kallen »

If you change to a chevy would you not have to change the bell housing? Also with reverse rotation engine (chrysler ) does chevy make one? If these are orginal carbs they would be carters.
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

kallen wrote:If you change to a chevy would you not have to change the bell housing? Also with reverse rotation engine (chrysler ) does chevy make one? I
Misunderstood I thought you where saying you would have to replace them twice as often . (opps) I would think if repowering with chevy they would be getting complete engines ( bobtail )














0
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
kallen
Sporadic User
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:48 pm
Location: Ivy lee, ontario,canada

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by kallen »

You wont find a chrysler bobtail. A bobtail engine might still need a differant oil pan, exhaust manifolds and a carb.
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

kallen wrote:You wont find a chrysler bobtail. A bobtail engine might still need a differant oil pan, exhaust manifolds and a carb.

I said if replacing with a Chevy , I would think they would get a bobtail . Not Chrysler .
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
kallen
Sporadic User
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:48 pm
Location: Ivy lee, ontario,canada

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by kallen »

It will still boil down to cost.$$$$$$$
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

Costs and what you want out of your boat

Here is another option worth every penny to the owner and I understand why .
http://www.trojanboats.net/wforum/viewt ... f=1&t=8833
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
User avatar
prowlersfish
2024 Gold Support
2024 Gold Support
Posts: 12665
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Re: Repowering f32-Chrysler or Chevy

Post by prowlersfish »

Costs and what you want out of your boat

Here is another option worth every penny to the owner and I understand why .
http://www.trojanboats.net/wforum/viewt ... f=1&t=8833
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
Post Reply