Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:37 am
by Torcan
Allen Sr wrote:
Torcan wrote:Not a fan of that boat, it just looks..well..wrong..
Which one? The express or the fly bridge?
The one pictured at beginning of thread
10 meter Aft Cabin

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:20 am
by RWS
bunk arrangements on the 10 Meter International Express Cruiser:

fwd abin = 2
dinette converts to bunk = 2
2 port single bunks = 2

six total bunks

add in the aft cabin

2 more bunks plus an additional head = 2-4 more guests

So now you have 8 - 10 bodies on board, sleeping comfortably.

When it's time to get up, where do you put them?

Especially if it's raining?

Six on my Express is tight in the cabin

RWS

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:10 am
by Allen Sr
RWS wrote:bunk arrangements on the 10 Meter International Express Cruiser:

fwd abin = 2
dinette converts to bunk = 2
2 port single bunks = 2

six total bunks

add in the aft cabin

2 more bunks plus an additional head = 2-4 more guests

So now you have 8 - 10 bodies on board, sleeping comfortably.

When it's time to get up, where do you put them?

Especially if it's raining?

Six on my Express is tight in the cabin

RWS
That was my thought when that 10meter aft cabin express was for sale up by me. Absolutely NO deck room! I don't know if the structural integrity of the deck/ceiling of the aft cabin could withstand all that punishment if you had a large group of people on board.

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:21 am
by DOUGNASH
Allen Sr wrote:
RWS wrote:bunk arrangements on the 10 Meter International Express Cruiser:

fwd abin = 2
dinette converts to bunk = 2
2 port single bunks = 2

six total bunks

add in the aft cabin

2 more bunks plus an additional head = 2-4 more guests

So now you have 8 - 10 bodies on board, sleeping comfortably.

When it's time to get up, where do you put them?

Especially if it's raining?

Six on my Express is tight in the cabin

RWS
That was my thought when that 10meter aft cabin express was for sale up by me. Absolutely NO deck room! I don't know if the structural integrity of the deck/ceiling of the aft cabin could withstand all that punishment if you had a large group of people on board.



I have to agree with you guys here.

I cant believe Trojan actually produced this model.

Not that it is bad looking or ugly, but as far as design, space planning and functionality on a scale of 1 to 10 I give it a -2!!

The only thing this type of boat is good for is 2 cruising couples spending a long weekend on her somewhere, each couple gets the privacy of a separate sleeping cabin and since its only 4 people total, daytime activities there wont be any problems stepping on each other.

The funniest thing about her, did you notice the fishing rod holders on the aft cabin railing??

Lets be serious, could you image standing on the aft cabin fishing anywhere besides in a cove where there are no wakes or swells etc.

Total waste of hard earned money if you ask me...

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:18 pm
by Torcan
The Water Edsel

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:47 pm
by prowlersfish
Torcan wrote:The Water Edsel


I like that :D or how about the Edsel of the sea ! :D

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:05 pm
by RWS
Edsel?

No not hardly

Realy depends on what your usage needs are.

A convertible with the aft cabin gives a tremendous versatility.

Not for someone who is big into fishing.

Two SEPERATE cabins ...

each with thie rOWN HVAC and HEAD and SHower?

Edsel?

REALLY ?

It totally depends on the needs of the boater.

Entertaining?

Overnighting?

A fewdeck chairs on the top of the aft cabin wiuth cocktails?

You and the wifeage in the fwd cabin with a newlywed couple in th eaft cabin raising hell?

Not too shabby.

RWS

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:24 pm
by prowlersfish
RWS taking about the express aft cabin (first post ) not a convertible / fly bridge .

Edsel :D

The express is a great looking boat but that box kills it IMO

BTW the Edsel failed be cuse it was a head of the times

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:38 pm
by rbcool
The edsel failed because it was FUGLY :lol: :lol:

Ron 8)

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:50 am
by alexander38
rbcool wrote:The edsel failed because it was FUGLY :lol: :lol:

Ron 8)
Buick suckin' a lemon...that's what my grand-dad called them...

And that box on the back of the 10m looks adhoc inside and out, seems they needed to get an aft-cabin boat in to the market fast and came up with this. IMO...

And no I'm not puttin' down TROJAN...All boat makers put out Volts..... :D

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:03 am
by prowlersfish
Aft-cabins , house boats , Boating's Edsels :D

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:50 pm
by alexander38
:roll: :roll: :roll:

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:02 pm
by prowlersfish
Fair play 8)

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:37 pm
by alexander38
yada yada yada

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:30 pm
by Torcan
I can see a few celebrities wanting a boat like that.

"Here dear, stand here while I take your picture with the water and sun as a backdrop"

Ooops, I inadvertantly throttled up and...splash.....

That little railing isn't going to help much,

It scares me just thinking of standing on it