Page 1 of 1
Seacock or In-line ball valve for F-26 - Need advise
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:41 pm
by randyp
My '77 F-26 did not come equipped with a seacock on the water inlet (the original invoice says this was a $40 option at the time of purchase...) It has a bronze strainer and fitting to a straight pipe, connected to the inlet hose off a 90 degree elbow. The lack of any water shut-off on this most vulnerable point has me thinking I can replace this the "easy way" by fitting an in-line ball valve between the inlet and the engine supply hose by mounting this valve on the current inlet fitting. Is there any pros and cons I need to know about or should I just install a seacock when the boat is pulled for the season?
Thanks
Phosphour bronze
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:53 pm
by Buckknekkid
You should be more worried about the old through hull falling apart when you touch it.ask any welder. Put in a new one and be secure...
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:15 am
by gopher
Good point...
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:15 am
by randyp
I know....I know.....just trying to take the easy way, but it makes more sense to put in a seacock. All the fittings are sound (strainer, inlet, etc.) It's a freshwater boat only used 3-4 months each season.
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:40 pm
by gopher
I need to do the same.....
..surveyor had a bit of an issue with it missing....
Guess nobody did beofre, though....lol
The orig owners didn't opt for that valve or a shower when mine was commissioned back in '73. Nice solid boats, though
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:42 pm
by randyp
Yep, they are that. Mine had a soft spot on the starboard bow deck - took care of it from the inside, but one of these days I'm going to do a better job of it. I've updated the plumbing, bilge, electrical, battery capacity, etc and the engine is in great shape. The lack of the seacock AND strainer between it and the engine intake makes me glad the boat's been on an inland freshwater lake! Taking it on the Erie Canal next summer so want to get more updates done before then.
Best
Well
Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:45 pm
by rossjo
Luck being what it is - now that you have identified a problem - it will probably go wrong!
No reason to gamble with your boat. I would do both - short term fix and long term solution, but not wait itoo long.
You may ruin the fitting trying to "fix" it now - and be up s**t creek (at at the bottom of it), so make sure it is really solid before messing with it.
Good luck my friend!
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:09 am
by randyp
Thanks, Ross. The fittings are all sound and I'll wait until it's hauled out to mess with anything. Replacing the water heater and holding tank also, so I'll be spending some quality time hunkered down in the F-26's "engine tomb".
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:45 pm
by jon_e_quest
randyp: RE: 7/17/07 post: While an in-line ball valve will accomplish the task of shutting the intake water off if needed, the combined ball valve-on-top-of-the-thru hull installation is taller than a proper seacock installation (which is screwed directly to the bottom of the boat), and could snap off if accidentally struck... probably at the exposed thru-hull threads.
It costs more, but a seacock is designed and built for the task.