F32 Rudder Shafts

This forum is for comments and the exchange of information relating to Trojan Boats and boating. Please do not post used parts or boats For Sale in this area. For general, non-boating topics please use our "General Discussions" section.

Note: Negative or inflammatory postings will not be tolerated.

Moderators: BeaconMarineBob, Moderator, BeaconMarineDon

Post Reply
trepka2001
Registered user
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:57 am
Location: New York

F32 Rudder Shafts

Post by trepka2001 »

I need to replace a bent rudder shaft and was wondering if it could be replaced with stainless and if not, why???

Thanks
wowzer52
Active User
Posts: 959
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Longview, Wa.

Post by wowzer52 »

yes it can, and much better. in my opinion.
1975 F-32 "SIMPLY BLESSED"
User avatar
ready123
Ultimate User
Posts: 1841
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:53 pm
Location: Mactier, Ontario Canada
Contact:

Post by ready123 »

wowzer52 wrote:yes it can, and much better. in my opinion.
Not so fast, quoting some experts in galvanic action:
"Generally, it is a bad idea to use stainless steel underwater, because it can pit. When it pits the "nobility" of the metal changes locally, and you end up with tiny galvanic couples that are made up of different parts of the same piece of metal and the pits grow deeper. One school of thought suggests that if you must use stainless steel underwater (e.g. you need its strength), then you should connect a nearby, immersed zinc to it; this protects the stainless steel from itself, reducing the rate of pitting. The electrochemistry of this assertion is compelling enough to recommend that you protect a stainless steel rudder shaft with a zinc. This may be done by mounting a zinc on the hull near the rudder shaft, and electrically connect it (inside the hull) to the stainless rudder shaft. For the reasons described above, ensure that your metal rudder shaft is not electrically connected to anything else. Your stainless steel propeller shaft will be protected from itself, by the same shaft zinc that protects the propeller from the stainless steel shaft. In both cases the pits, if they appear, will appear where the stainless steel is not exposed to the water. Trouble areas are in the cutlass bearing, inside the rudder bearing, and just inside the top of the rudder."
Reprinted from West Marine's West Advisors http://www.sailmail.com/grounds.htm

Just another viewpoint to think about... how often do we disassemble the rudder assembly to spot this potential pitting in the rudder bearing assembly?
Michael
Rum is the reason Pirate's have never ruled the world
Done Dreamin'
1987 President 43' Twin Lehman 225SP Turbo
Highfield 310 Ally 15 HP Yamaha 2cycle
1978 F32 Sedan twin 318 Chry SOLD
Safe Cove Marina, Port Charlotte, FL
User avatar
prowlersfish
2025 Gold Support
2025 Gold Support
Posts: 12724
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Post by prowlersfish »

I also think you would be better off with the stanless shaft many rudders are made wtih stanless shafts just like most boats have stanless prop shafts yes I have seen pitted shafts but I have seen proplems with broze shafts also ( and monel also) . its really no issue just keep good zincs on as you should no matter what you have .

you should have zincs on your rudders anyway
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
Danny Bailey
Moderate User
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Oriental, NC

Post by Danny Bailey »

SS rudder shaft will be fine if you never run aground again. If you do you risk ripping the stuffing box out of the stern and leaving a 6 inch hole in the bottom. Rudder shafts are bronze because it bends easily.
1980 F-36 with 6BTA 250 Cummins enjoying the Sounds and coastal waters of North Carolina
trepka2001
Registered user
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:57 am
Location: New York

Post by trepka2001 »

excellent point that i didn't think of at all. i think i'll stick with bronze!!!
Post Reply