Zinc Modification or Fuggedaboutit?
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:21 pm
My Yanmar 6-LP engines have one very difficult to replace pencil zinc at the rear of the heat exchanger.
Not only is it the most difficult to access, it also is the one zinc in the entire system that is used up the soonest.
I am considering removing this zinc and installing a 45 degree elbow which would be attached to a pipe with a fitting at the end where I would screw in a larger pencil zinc.
The whole extension "housing" if you will would be a down angle arrangement. This would insure that there was always water allowing for conductivity.
This way I can get easier access, plus more "zinc" material in this location.
So here's the issue:
1. will this work in theory & reality?
2. should I use brass pipe & fittings or galvanized pipe & fittings?
3. is there ANY reason why this would not work?
Your comments are appreciated.
RWS
Not only is it the most difficult to access, it also is the one zinc in the entire system that is used up the soonest.
I am considering removing this zinc and installing a 45 degree elbow which would be attached to a pipe with a fitting at the end where I would screw in a larger pencil zinc.
The whole extension "housing" if you will would be a down angle arrangement. This would insure that there was always water allowing for conductivity.
This way I can get easier access, plus more "zinc" material in this location.
So here's the issue:
1. will this work in theory & reality?
2. should I use brass pipe & fittings or galvanized pipe & fittings?
3. is there ANY reason why this would not work?
Your comments are appreciated.
RWS