I/O versus inboard

This forum is for comments and the exchange of information relating to Trojan Boats and boating. Please do not post used parts or boats For Sale in this area. For general, non-boating topics please use our "General Discussions" section.

Note: Negative or inflammatory postings will not be tolerated.

Moderators: BeaconMarineBob, Moderator, BeaconMarineDon

Post Reply
kevin babineau
Moderate User
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:39 pm
Location: ipswich ma

I/O versus inboard

Post by kevin babineau »

so what is everyone opinion....i say that an i/o is more versital but an inboard has a better planning speed..weight distribution is better on an inboard....there r different opinions...some say that the new POD set ups r like the inboards...but id have to wait another 30 years or so to find out...lol.....
gopher
Registered user
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:47 am
Location: Southern Ontario

Post by gopher »

I've had two inboards and two sterndrives... (well, the first one was my parents )... The balance with the engine midship is better, ..
The oldest stern drive was ok... nice and manouverable for a 22' cruiser..
The newer one ran out nice... but the ongoing maintenance for bellow repairs, u-joints, etc was a major PITA.... Although somewhat more difficult to back-up.. I love the inboards..
The pods look fantastic.. I suppose, till those big seals start failing and the boat sinks like a stone....??
Greg
wet wonder
Registered user
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Philadelphia

Post by wet wonder »

I don't know about balance, but I much prefer inboards due to their simplicity.

Seems like folks at the marina are often having very expensive problems w/ IOs. I've never had a problem with an Inboard.

A duel inboard is very easy to maneuver. I have a single screw now and can back it in on a dime, even w/ wind and current. Though I know people with single screws that have a lot of trouble reversing.

And seems like I see newbies everyweekend crashing their I/O rigs at 4 or 5 knots right into their slip or their neighbor's boat.

So to me, the inboard is simpler, less maintenance, and very maneuverable once you get the hang of it.
1975 Trojan F-25 Express Hardtop
Mercruiser 351 233hp
12v system - Solar panels 170 watts
User avatar
randyp
Active User
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Post by randyp »

Nothing, absolutely nothing, sounds better than an inboard. I/O are more versatile in my opinion, but that cool sound from the inboard is still the best!
Randy P
1977 F-26 HT
"Blue Heron"
Dan Faith
Sporadic User
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:17 pm
Location: Akron, Oh

Post by Dan Faith »

I have owned and ran outboard, IOs and inboards. Inboards are a lot less maintenance, at my place on lake Erie we have about 30 IO's and I have seen all the lower units taken off for some sort of repair. The inboards a prop stike now and then but never a transmission problem. The one I had in a ten year period the lower unit gear problems rebuilt three times. (two were prop strikes in a shallow lake) Plus on IO's is menuverablily at slow speeds, especially if you have twins.
Dan Faith
Toy Box

Trojan F32
Trojan 30' sport fisherman
Sea Ray 17'
Beach Craft Bonanza N35
Corvette
User avatar
prowlersfish
2025 Gold Support
2025 Gold Support
Posts: 12723
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: Lower Chesapeake Bay ,Va

Post by prowlersfish »

The I/O in most case are faster and have edge on fuel . But I will Take a inboard any day.
Boating is good for the soul
77/78 TROJAN F36 Conv.
6BTA Cummins diesels
Life is to short for a ugly boat :D
Post Reply